Urbanrise Gattahalli Masterplan

These figures come from proposal SIA/KA/INFRA2/583353/2026, a fresh environmental clearance application under activity 8(a) Building and Construction, filed by Alliance Grandeur Homes Private Limited on 7 July 2026. Its status is under verification.

Two things about that table matter more than any individual number. The first is that it is a proposal, not a permission. The environmental application was filed on 7 July 2026 and is under verification. No environmental clearance has been granted, no terms of reference have been issued, and the project is not registered with the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority. Nothing here has been approved, cleared or sanctioned.

The second is that the filed programme names the clubhouse in the project title itself. The scheme was described to the regulator as an apartment and club house project, and the clubhouse carries its own floor configuration. That is unusual enough to be worth noticing, and we return to it below.

The filed built-up area converts to roughly 857,000 sq ft at 10.7639 sq ft to the square metre. Set beside 368 homes, that is a large number, and the arithmetic is worth doing carefully because it is easy to misread.

All three are our own estimates, derived from the two filed figures. None of them is a specification.

The first line is the one most likely to be misunderstood. Built-up area in an environmental filing is a gross number. It counts basements, parking decks, ramps, lift cores, corridors, staircases, services, walls and the clubhouse. It is not saleable area and it is certainly not carpet area. The client brief circulates a tentative configuration table — 2 BHK at 1,100 to 1,250 sq ft and 3 BHK at 1,300 to 1,615 sq ft, self-labelled tentative and unverified by us. If those sizes were to hold, the gap between roughly 2,330 sq ft of gross built-up area per home and an apartment of 1,100 to 1,615 sq ft is where two basements of parking, the circulation cores, the services and the clubhouse live. That gap is normal. It is also the reason a buyer should never read a built-up area figure as an indication of apartment size.

The second line is a ratio, not a floor area ratio. Sanctioned FAR is calculated to a planning authority's own rules, which commonly exclude basement parking and some service areas from the count. Our 4.69 includes everything the promoter declared. The sanctioned FAR, when a plan is approved, will be a different and almost certainly lower number. We publish the ratio only because it is a fair measure of how intensively the parcel is being used.

The filing gives the club house its own configuration — two basement floors, a ground floor and two upper floors. Five levels, in a building the filing treats as distinct from the residential blocks. The project was registered with the regulator under a name that includes the clubhouse.

On a 4.20-acre site, a dedicated five-level amenity building is a genuine commitment rather than a marketing line. It is structurally different from the common alternative, where amenity space is carved out of a podium or a tower's lower floors and shares its structure and services with apartments. A standalone building can hold the plant a pool and a gym need, can be operated on its own hours, and keeps noise away from bedrooms.

What the filing does not give is the clubhouse's floor area, its facilities, or where it sits on the plot. The brief carries an area figure, which we handle in the unverified section below. No amenity schedule has been published by Urbanrise or by Alliance Grandeur Homes, and the generic amenity list attached to the material we received could not be tied to this project, so we do not publish it as this scheme's amenity set.

Everything in this section comes from the client brief supplied to us. None of it appears in the government filing, and none of it has been published by Urbanrise or by Alliance Grandeur Homes. We set it out in full here, because a buyer is entitled to see what is being said about the scheme. We do not assert any of it. The services and sustainability items in the same block are also recorded, attributed and unverified, on the amenities page; nowhere on this site is any of it presented as a specification for this project.

Taken one at a time, here is what each would mean for a resident if it held.

Landscape at 26.30% of the site. Just over a quarter of the parcel as soft landscape would be a reasonable figure for a scheme at this density, and it would mean a resident on an upper floor looks down on greenery rather than on parked cars. Note that the percentage is our own division of the brief's area figure by the filed site area, and that it happens to be numerically identical to the brief's separate power-saving claim. We record that coincidence without drawing any conclusion from it. Both remain unverified.

A 1,691 sq m park. At about 0.42 acre it would be a single usable open space rather than a set of leftover strips, which matters far more than a total landscape percentage. Whether it reads as a park or as a lawn depends entirely on where it sits relative to the blocks, and no plan shows that.

432 parking spaces for 368 homes. About 1.17 spaces per home means the majority of apartments would get one space, with a limited pool beyond that. For a 2 and 3 BHK scheme on a corridor where most households drive to work, that is tight. Visitor parking, if it comes out of the same 432, makes it tighter. This is a question to put to the developer in writing.

92 EV charging provisions. The brief's own two figures do not agree with each other: 92 of 432 spaces is 21.3%, and a genuine 25% of 432 would be 108. That is not a large discrepancy, but it is the kind of internal inconsistency that shows the numbers were assembled rather than measured, and it is one reason we treat the whole block as unverified. Note also that a charging "provision" usually means conduit and load allocation, not an installed charger.

A 300 KLD sewage treatment plant. Spread across 368 homes that is about 815 litres per home per day of treatment capacity. What matters to a resident is less the headline number than where the plant sits, how it is enclosed, and whether treated water is actually reused for landscape and flushing. None of that is published.

29 recharge pits. One pit per roughly 586 sq m of site. Recharge pits only work if they are maintained and if the stormwater actually reaches them, which is a maintenance question for the eventual owners' association rather than a construction one.

Access from a 9 m road. The brief describes access as direct from the 9 m Gattahalli Main Road. We cannot verify the width. If it is right, a nine-metre carriageway is narrow for a development of 368 homes, and it would be the single most important physical constraint on the site. Every construction vehicle during the build and every resident car afterwards would use it. Anyone considering this project should drive that approach at the evening peak before forming a view, and should ask whether any road widening is proposed under the Anekal planning authority's scheme.

The site tests outside the Greater Bengaluru Authority boundary, about 2.8 km east of its nearest edge, placing it in the BMRDA planning region under Anekal jurisdiction. That margin is thinner than it sounds, and the boundary is politically live, so it is worth confirming rather than assuming. In practical terms, buyers should expect panchayat khata and panchayat property tax rather than BBMP A-khata, and should confirm the khata classification on the specific survey number before purchase. It also means the plan sanction, when it comes, will come from the planning authority with jurisdiction over this parcel — a detail worth verifying on the sanction letter itself rather than in a brochure.

When Urbanrise does release drawings, these are the points on which a published plan either holds up or does not:

1. The sanctioned plan number, its date, and the authority that issued it — not a rendering.
2. The number of blocks, and how many homes share each lift core on a typical floor.
3. Whether the two basement levels actually deliver the parking count claimed, and what visitors get.
4. Landscape shown as sanctioned open space, with dimensions, rather than as a percentage in a brochure.
5. Where the sewage treatment plant, generator yard and refuse point sit relative to the nearest bedrooms.
6. The access road's sanctioned width, and whether any widening is proposed.
7. Whether the clubhouse is in the first phase, and what its handover condition is.
8. The K-RERA registration number, once granted, and the sanctioned plan set filed with it.